![]() ![]() Hold down both the input and filter … If you compare the natural qualities versus what the reviewers say about the strengths of the two DAC's, it becomes clear to me that the R26 is the one that conveys the most real or natural sound. The SDA was a nice upgrade over my former Gustard A18 by being more musical while remaining … Well, here’s a well-written review of the R26 that he gave an overall score of 94. I recently sold my Gustard X-20 for a Gustard X26 Pro. By beerandmusic in DAC - Digital to Analog Conversion. Triangle Magellan Concerto 2 192kHz source but short of a new battery powered laptop or some really well built source, you’re going to have some noise … It is a first seeing two voltage switches instead of a single one, you can select between 115 and 220 V input, those switches are connected directly to a pair of custom 50W toroidal transformers so it makes sense. The latter has a higher … A26 felt sharper sounding and slightly more defined, as the contours of the notes were outlined via A26. Although not as warm and thick as the Mojo, it has better tonal balance while not sacrificing much in the realm of musicality. Qutest must be more transportable than ADI2 because there are various USB external batteries satisfying 5V/2A requirement. Gustard X26 Pro has to compete with Chord Qutest DAC. Got a chance to carefully compare Qutest with ADI-2 DAC and Gungnir Multibit yesterday. ![]() Qutest was very lightweight, even lighter than ADI2. In order to offer high quality filters, Gustard has chosen to develop its own filters using a DSP Analog Device SHARC chip. Compared to the transistor side it is a little lighter, not as heavy-handed with a slower pace and doubtless an increase in even-harmonic distortion. There's absolutely zero difference between pre mode and dac mode (-0db) when playing PCM. I recently purchased a Benchmark Dac3 HGC and a Gustard X26 pro to compare against my lowly SMSL SU8 v2 dac. Most of the time such efforts result in disasters performance wise. Cons: A Little … Indeed, Gustard is on track with the midrange and the holographic presentation and detail are up there with the big boyz. Major findings … In the default position, the A26 will enable its analog volume control if the volume is lower than -24dB, which should not lower its dynamic range. I have to say, I was really eager to test what is considered to be one of the DACs to beat in this price range (below $2k). Share at 9:24 AM Post #659 of 660 Zaurux A26 felt sharper sounding and slightly more defined, as the contours of the notes were outlined via A26. State of the art performance is achieved albeit at high cost. ![]() I wanted to truly see what the difference would be after using the superb under $550 all in one streamer and DAC vs using the blue sound as a streamer only, fed into the Chord Qutest DAC. The Qutest lacks the amplification stage and headphone outputs, it also lacks the Bluetooth receiver. Gustard A26 DAC⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️Price: 1500USD The Gustard X16 is now on a list, joining the SMSL SU-9 and Denafrips Ares II as possibilities. But I would say, it is slightly better in almost every aspect, and all those slight improvements, add up to a substantial improvement. Had not the fire … The measurements between the Modius and the Qutest are very similar, so I am surprised that there would be much perceived difference, aside from the obvious differences between single-end vs. 2V micro-USB power input, two BNC coaxial, and one TosLink optical input in addition to one pair of RCA single … Well, here’s a well-written review of the R26 that he gave an overall score of 94. For sure, the DAC inside the Qutest is stellar. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |